Monthly June 2016
MONTHLY JUNE 2016 |
|||
Every publication is an event, a small event in the world of ideas and texts. Or at least, in one’s own world, of ideas and texts. Echo of the first event, the event of creativity, where intuitions and skeletons of sights mingle to give shape to a text, its offspring, subsequent event, the publication, is a submission to the outer world. It is a self-giving, a surrender, an exhibition accepting that no text is destined to be reader-less, and that no preconceived notion of an ideal reception should make up for the independent life and future of a creation. Samuel |
|||
SAMVRITI MONTHLY ・ JUNE 2016 | |||
ESSAY SERIES | |||
Behind the Glim | 6 December 2013 | ||
Reason and the Senses : A Dialogue Between Buddhism and Christianity |
30 November 2013 | ||
ESSAYS | |||
Out of the Circle : Kentron | 17 February 2014 | ||
Behind the Glim | ||
Behind the Enlightenment and its lumières : darkness. A small glim, but already enough to blind us. These many lights, popping from all sides — heritage of the Enlightenment and its impressive symbolics. Forever after, the metaphor is consumed and digested, and if the image behind it is made blurry by the flame, we consider that the contrast speaks for the background alone. But another process has already started. Recent historians in India have shown a path to think differently the Enlightenment, to transcend the duality of pre-modern and modern, and to reconceptualise the very hypothesis of historical periods altogether. |
||
EXPLORE THE SERIES |
Reason and the Senses : A Dialogue Between Buddhism and Christianity |
||
To do justice to the cultural heritage of any religion, one must not limit the study only to a philosophical enquiry. While philosophy may, as in this series, remain the spinal cord of a reflection on such a topic, one must also open thoughts to domains such as theology, sociology, political thought, history and gender study, among others. The present reflection is, thus, intended as an authentically interdisciplinary exploration of the two traditions, and such, around an angle, once again, which transcends the simplistic barriers of any single intellectual discipline : reason and the senses. . . |
||
EXPLORE THE SERIES |
Out of the Circle : Kentron | ||
17 February 2014 | ||
Ethnocentrism is the feared ghost of the anthropologist’s good conscience. The colonial agenda of early anthropology, in the 19th century, would soon be complemented by the conscientious methodological and ethical concerns of mid 20th century ethnologists, within which the structuralist lineage would quickly acquire a leading position. Claude Lévi-Strauss displayed some strategic intelligence when acknowledging that his “theory of myth is itself on a par with myth,” that is, as Soper suggests, that we could perhaps “view the very quest for such objectivity as part of the mythology of the West”. Or was it the sign of a genuine empathy, an authentic foot of equality between western culture, necessarily the reference for him, and the faraway societies he was studying? . . . |
||
READ THE ESSAY | ||